Performance Analysis of 6G Enabled Smart Cities and Edge Computing
Implementation Plan:
—————————
Scenario -1 🙁 Application Scenario: Earthquake Disaster Management)
————————————————————————————
Step 1: Initially, we constructed a 6G network with Network Slices consisting of 500 – IOT Devices, 20 Small Cell Towers, 5 Drones, 2 – Fog Clouds, 1- Main Cloud, 1 Server, 1 – Base Station and 20 Edge Nodes.
Step 2: Next, we Simulate and collect earthquake detection using IoT-based accelerometers and seismic sensors at central critical points and send the data to the fog cloud and preprocess the collected data.
Step 3: Next, we Connect all IoT devices to Fog Clouds and the Main Cloud, ensuring users get safe route updates even during earthquakes/Tsunami .
Step 4: Next, implement an AI/ML-based predictive and prescriptive analytics system for safe earthquake/Tsunami escape routes, The Fog Cloud will perform the analytics and send the safe route decision to users.
Step 5 : Next, we Encrypt and Decrypt the data between IOT devices, Main Cloud, and Fog clouds using AES method.
Step 6: Next, we perform dynamic resource allocation and DNN Offloading based on infrastructure.
Step 7: Next, we perform a sudden failure disaster triggering for specific IoT devices and identifying the affected nodes via proximity coordinates and scaling the Disaster intensity.
Step 8: Next, we collect the drone based real-time evacuation data after disaster scaling intensity.
Step 9: Next, we perform a shutting down non-critical IoT devices, rerouting the traffic and showing the results as logs.
Step 10: Next, we Integrate a task with emergency services (drones, ambulances) for quick responses using Fog-to-Cloud Integrated Emergency Response System (FCI-ERS).
Step 11: Next, we simulate the aftershock Triggers (optional delayed secondary failures) and Tsunami alert broadcast (emergency broadcast simulation).
Step 12: Next, We display the safe route decision and earthquake/Tsunami disaster updates, either from the IoT Devices or the Fog Cloud.
Step 13: Next, we Identify the affected zone and Activate evacuation protocols and send alert to nearest fire stations.
Step 14: Next, we Increase UDP traffic rate from emergency nodes after earthquake
Step 15: Finally, We plot the Performance Metrics such as
15.1: Time (s) vs Packet Delivery Ratio (%)
15.2: Time (s) vs End-To-End Latency (ms)
15.3: Time (s) vs Throughput (Mbps)
15.4: Time of occurrence vs Detection delay (ms)
15.5: Time (s) vs Disaster Intensity (nodes affected)
15.6: Time (s) vs Evacuation Success Rate (%)
15.7: Time (s) vs Number of IoT Devices per severity category
15.8: Time (s) vs Offloading Success Rate (%)
15.9: Time (s) vs Number of Drones Active
15.10: Time (s) vs Packet Rate (bps)
15.11: Time (s) vs Packet Loss Rate (%)
15.12: Disaster Intensity vs Safe Route Accuracy (%)
15.13: Time (s) vs Decision Latency (ms)
Software Requirements:
—————————–
1. Development Tool: OMNeT++ 5.6.2
2. Operating System: Windows 11 (64-bit)
Note:
——-
[1] If the above plan does not satisfy your requirement, please provide the processing details, like the above step-by-step.
[2] Please note that this implementation plan does not include any further steps after it is put into implementation.
[3] Please understand that any modifications made to the confirmed implementation plan will not be made before or after the project development.
[4] If the above plan satisfies your requirement please confirm with us.
[5] Project based on Simulation only, not a real time project.
| Technology | Ph.D | MS | M.Tech |
|---|---|---|---|
| NS2 | 75 | 117 | 95 |
| NS3 | 98 | 119 | 206 |
| OMNET++ | 103 | 95 | 87 |
| OPNET | 36 | 64 | 89 |
| QULANET | 30 | 76 | 60 |
| MININET | 71 | 62 | 74 |
| MATLAB | 96 | 185 | 180 |
| LTESIM | 38 | 32 | 16 |
| COOJA SIMULATOR | 35 | 67 | 28 |
| CONTIKI OS | 42 | 36 | 29 |
| GNS3 | 35 | 89 | 14 |
| NETSIM | 35 | 11 | 21 |
| EVE-NG | 4 | 8 | 9 |
| TRANS | 9 | 5 | 4 |
| PEERSIM | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| GLOMOSIM | 6 | 10 | 6 |
| RTOOL | 13 | 15 | 8 |
| KATHARA SHADOW | 9 | 8 | 9 |
| VNX and VNUML | 8 | 7 | 8 |
| WISTAR | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| CNET | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| ESCAPE | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| NETMIRAGE | 7 | 11 | 7 |
| BOSON NETSIM | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| VIRL | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| CISCO PACKET TRACER | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| SWAN | 9 | 19 | 5 |
| JAVASIM | 40 | 68 | 69 |
| SSFNET | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| TOSSIM | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| PSIM | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| PETRI NET | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| ONESIM | 5 | 10 | 5 |
| OPTISYSTEM | 32 | 64 | 24 |
| DIVERT | 4 | 9 | 8 |
| TINY OS | 19 | 27 | 17 |
| TRANS | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| OPENPANA | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| SECURE CRT | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| EXTENDSIM | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| CONSELF | 7 | 19 | 6 |
| ARENA | 5 | 12 | 9 |
| VENSIM | 8 | 10 | 7 |
| MARIONNET | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| NETKIT | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| GEOIP | 9 | 17 | 8 |
| REAL | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| NEST | 5 | 10 | 9 |
| PTOLEMY | 7 | 8 | 4 |