Performance Analysis of V2X Network Intelligent Traffic

Performance Analysis of V2X Network Intelligent Traffic

Performance Analysis of V2X Network for Intelligent Traffic Management

Implementation plan:

Step 1: Initially, we constructed a V2x network using 30 – Vehicles, 4 Edge Servers, 1 Blockchain Node, and 2 RSUs.

Step 2: Then, we simulate and collect network traffic data from vehicles.

Step 3: Next, we integrate edge computing nodes into the blockchain network for distributed processing and reduce latency in data sharing.

Step 4: Next, we implement smart contracts for secure data access control, privacy preservation, and tamper-proof storage in the blockchain.

Step 5: Next, we train deep learning models using DRL for traffic flow prediction and congestion detection using the collected data.

Step 6: Next, we develop a Deep reinforcement learning algorithm for adaptive traffic signal control and vehicle routing while assessing network load adaptability under varying traffic volumes.

Step 7: Finally, we plot performance for the following metrics:

7.1: Number of Vehicles vs. End-to-End Latency (ms)
7.2: Number of Vehicles vs. Transaction Confirmation Latency (ms)
7.3: Number of Vehicles vs. Edge Processing Latency (ms)
7.4: Number of Vehicles vs. Transaction Throughput (Mbps)
7.5: Number of Vehicles vs. Edge data processing rate (%)
7.6: Number of Vehicles vs. Network Scalability (%)
7.7: Number of Vehicles vs. Data Storage Scalability (%)
7.8: Number of Vehicles vs. Communication Overhead (transactions)
7.9: Number of Vehicles vs. Computational Cost ($)
7.10: Number of Vehicles vs. Security Overhead (%)
7.11: Number of Vehicles vs. Attack detection rate (%)
7.12: Number of Vehicles vs. False Positive rate (%)
7.13: Number of Vehicles vs. Network Uptime(ms)
7.14:Number of Vehicles vs. Packet Loss Rate (%)
7.15: Number of Vehicles vs. Energy Consumption (J)
7.16: Number of Vehicles vs. Transaction Operational Cost($)
7.17: Number of Transactions vs. Energy Consumption (J)
7.18: Number of Epochs vs. Accuracy (%)
7.19: Number of Epochs vs. Precision (%)
7.20: Number of Epochs vs. Recall (%)
7.21: Number of Epochs vs. F1 Score (%)
7.22: Number of Epochs vs. AUC Curve

Software Requirements:

1. Development Tool: OMNeT++ 6.1 with Veins
2. Operating System: Windows 10 (64-bit) or above

Note

1) If the plan does not meet your requirements, provide detailed steps, parameters, models, or expected results in advance. Once implemented, changes won’t be possible without prior input; otherwise, we’ll proceed as per our implementation plan.

2) If the plan satisfies your requirement, Please confirm with us.

3) Project based on Simulation only, not a real time project.

4) Please understand that any modifications made to the confirmed implementation plan will not be made after the project development.

Live Tasks
Technology Ph.D MS M.Tech
NS2 75 117 95
NS3 98 119 206
OMNET++ 103 95 87
OPNET 36 64 89
QULANET 30 76 60
MININET 71 62 74
MATLAB 96 185 180
LTESIM 38 32 16
COOJA SIMULATOR 35 67 28
CONTIKI OS 42 36 29
GNS3 35 89 14
NETSIM 35 11 21
EVE-NG 4 8 9
TRANS 9 5 4
PEERSIM 8 8 12
GLOMOSIM 6 10 6
RTOOL 13 15 8
KATHARA SHADOW 9 8 9
VNX and VNUML 8 7 8
WISTAR 9 9 8
CNET 6 8 4
ESCAPE 8 7 9
NETMIRAGE 7 11 7
BOSON NETSIM 6 8 9
VIRL 9 9 8
CISCO PACKET TRACER 7 7 10
SWAN 9 19 5
JAVASIM 40 68 69
SSFNET 7 9 8
TOSSIM 5 7 4
PSIM 7 8 6
PETRI NET 4 6 4
ONESIM 5 10 5
OPTISYSTEM 32 64 24
DIVERT 4 9 8
TINY OS 19 27 17
TRANS 7 8 6
OPENPANA 8 9 9
SECURE CRT 7 8 7
EXTENDSIM 6 7 5
CONSELF 7 19 6
ARENA 5 12 9
VENSIM 8 10 7
MARIONNET 5 7 9
NETKIT 6 8 7
GEOIP 9 17 8
REAL 7 5 5
NEST 5 10 9
PTOLEMY 7 8 4

Related Pages

Workflow

YouTube Channel

Unlimited Network Simulation Results available here.

Related Topics