Performance Analysis of V2X Network for Intelligent Traffic Management
Implementation plan:
Step 1: Initially, we constructed a V2x network using 30 – Vehicles, 4 Edge Servers, 1 Blockchain Node, and 2 RSUs.
Step 2: Then, we simulate and collect network traffic data from vehicles.
Step 3: Next, we integrate edge computing nodes into the blockchain network for distributed processing and reduce latency in data sharing.
Step 4: Next, we implement smart contracts for secure data access control, privacy preservation, and tamper-proof storage in the blockchain.
Step 5: Next, we train deep learning models using DRL for traffic flow prediction and congestion detection using the collected data.
Step 6: Next, we develop a Deep reinforcement learning algorithm for adaptive traffic signal control and vehicle routing while assessing network load adaptability under varying traffic volumes.
Step 7: Finally, we plot performance for the following metrics:
7.1: Number of Vehicles vs. End-to-End Latency (ms)
7.2: Number of Vehicles vs. Transaction Confirmation Latency (ms)
7.3: Number of Vehicles vs. Edge Processing Latency (ms)
7.4: Number of Vehicles vs. Transaction Throughput (Mbps)
7.5: Number of Vehicles vs. Edge data processing rate (%)
7.6: Number of Vehicles vs. Network Scalability (%)
7.7: Number of Vehicles vs. Data Storage Scalability (%)
7.8: Number of Vehicles vs. Communication Overhead (transactions)
7.9: Number of Vehicles vs. Computational Cost ($)
7.10: Number of Vehicles vs. Security Overhead (%)
7.11: Number of Vehicles vs. Attack detection rate (%)
7.12: Number of Vehicles vs. False Positive rate (%)
7.13: Number of Vehicles vs. Network Uptime(ms)
7.14:Number of Vehicles vs. Packet Loss Rate (%)
7.15: Number of Vehicles vs. Energy Consumption (J)
7.16: Number of Vehicles vs. Transaction Operational Cost($)
7.17: Number of Transactions vs. Energy Consumption (J)
7.18: Number of Epochs vs. Accuracy (%)
7.19: Number of Epochs vs. Precision (%)
7.20: Number of Epochs vs. Recall (%)
7.21: Number of Epochs vs. F1 Score (%)
7.22: Number of Epochs vs. AUC Curve
Software Requirements:
1. Development Tool: OMNeT++ 6.1 with Veins
2. Operating System: Windows 10 (64-bit) or above
Note
1) If the plan does not meet your requirements, provide detailed steps, parameters, models, or expected results in advance. Once implemented, changes won’t be possible without prior input; otherwise, we’ll proceed as per our implementation plan.
2) If the plan satisfies your requirement, Please confirm with us.
3) Project based on Simulation only, not a real time project.
4) Please understand that any modifications made to the confirmed implementation plan will not be made after the project development.
| Technology | Ph.D | MS | M.Tech |
|---|---|---|---|
| NS2 | 75 | 117 | 95 |
| NS3 | 98 | 119 | 206 |
| OMNET++ | 103 | 95 | 87 |
| OPNET | 36 | 64 | 89 |
| QULANET | 30 | 76 | 60 |
| MININET | 71 | 62 | 74 |
| MATLAB | 96 | 185 | 180 |
| LTESIM | 38 | 32 | 16 |
| COOJA SIMULATOR | 35 | 67 | 28 |
| CONTIKI OS | 42 | 36 | 29 |
| GNS3 | 35 | 89 | 14 |
| NETSIM | 35 | 11 | 21 |
| EVE-NG | 4 | 8 | 9 |
| TRANS | 9 | 5 | 4 |
| PEERSIM | 8 | 8 | 12 |
| GLOMOSIM | 6 | 10 | 6 |
| RTOOL | 13 | 15 | 8 |
| KATHARA SHADOW | 9 | 8 | 9 |
| VNX and VNUML | 8 | 7 | 8 |
| WISTAR | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| CNET | 6 | 8 | 4 |
| ESCAPE | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| NETMIRAGE | 7 | 11 | 7 |
| BOSON NETSIM | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| VIRL | 9 | 9 | 8 |
| CISCO PACKET TRACER | 7 | 7 | 10 |
| SWAN | 9 | 19 | 5 |
| JAVASIM | 40 | 68 | 69 |
| SSFNET | 7 | 9 | 8 |
| TOSSIM | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| PSIM | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| PETRI NET | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| ONESIM | 5 | 10 | 5 |
| OPTISYSTEM | 32 | 64 | 24 |
| DIVERT | 4 | 9 | 8 |
| TINY OS | 19 | 27 | 17 |
| TRANS | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| OPENPANA | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| SECURE CRT | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| EXTENDSIM | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| CONSELF | 7 | 19 | 6 |
| ARENA | 5 | 12 | 9 |
| VENSIM | 8 | 10 | 7 |
| MARIONNET | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| NETKIT | 6 | 8 | 7 |
| GEOIP | 9 | 17 | 8 |
| REAL | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| NEST | 5 | 10 | 9 |
| PTOLEMY | 7 | 8 | 4 |