Network Routing Projects prefers a path in which the network devices perform successful data transmission. Now that the data in the form of packets can be of any type of info that sends through a route. Hence the selection of a route is on the basis of a set of steps. We are here to give you full details of the Network Routing Projects.
Let us start with network devices that can be of smartphones, sensors, and so on. In the long run, the coverage of each device is not the same. And hence it cannot transfer the data directly. So that, of course, it needs a route to transfer the data. Due to this, routing becomes an important process in far communication.
With this in mind, the process of routing performs in the following ways such as 1. Source to Destination, and 2. Source to the End server. In general, the routing protocol design can be static, dynamic, and default. To explain, in static, the path is fixed while in dynamic, the path is adaptive. At length, the network devices are dynamic in most cases, and hence adaptive will suit for such network.
It is not just like that we could design a network routing protocol. First of all, collect the routing objectives such as low delay, high QoS, and so on. Then, in view of the below measures, you can build a protocol.
In any case, the criteria to be a relay or forward can be as follows, transmission and hop count, the stability of link, relative velocity, trust, and others. To this point, an objective function can be defined by considering one or many metrics.
Then, as per the objective, the protocol design will incorporate for route selection. As you know, routing applies to many types of network with the use of some methods. Here are a few networks and their routing protocols.
In light of this, network routing simulator can also make bio-inspired as well as nature-inspired algorithms. Especially, this gives an optimal selection of route from the computation of fitness value. Apart from this for a large scale network, the areas for PhD projects in routing are ML, RL, and also AI are in use for network routing.
As a result, the designed routing protocol will test with its features and functions of the network. In order to view the goodness of the protocol design, it needs to validate the following parameters.
The testing network simulators as Ns3, OMNeT++, and others are an aid to measure the above metrics and beyond. Until now, we have touched on 60 plus works in this field over a variety of networks. In short, we would tell that you can select a topic with or without our help. But still, it does not ease to work with practical design. So that we are here to help you from time to time, come with a fresh mind and go with full stuff.
Technology | Ph.D | MS | M.Tech |
---|---|---|---|
NS2 | 75 | 117 | 95 |
NS3 | 98 | 119 | 206 |
OMNET++ | 103 | 95 | 87 |
OPNET | 36 | 64 | 89 |
QULANET | 30 | 76 | 60 |
MININET | 71 | 62 | 74 |
MATLAB | 96 | 185 | 180 |
LTESIM | 38 | 32 | 16 |
COOJA SIMULATOR | 35 | 67 | 28 |
CONTIKI OS | 42 | 36 | 29 |
GNS3 | 35 | 89 | 14 |
NETSIM | 35 | 11 | 21 |
EVE-NG | 4 | 8 | 9 |
TRANS | 9 | 5 | 4 |
PEERSIM | 8 | 8 | 12 |
GLOMOSIM | 6 | 10 | 6 |
RTOOL | 13 | 15 | 8 |
KATHARA SHADOW | 9 | 8 | 9 |
VNX and VNUML | 8 | 7 | 8 |
WISTAR | 9 | 9 | 8 |
CNET | 6 | 8 | 4 |
ESCAPE | 8 | 7 | 9 |
NETMIRAGE | 7 | 11 | 7 |
BOSON NETSIM | 6 | 8 | 9 |
VIRL | 9 | 9 | 8 |
CISCO PACKET TRACER | 7 | 7 | 10 |
SWAN | 9 | 19 | 5 |
JAVASIM | 40 | 68 | 69 |
SSFNET | 7 | 9 | 8 |
TOSSIM | 5 | 7 | 4 |
PSIM | 7 | 8 | 6 |
PETRI NET | 4 | 6 | 4 |
ONESIM | 5 | 10 | 5 |
OPTISYSTEM | 32 | 64 | 24 |
DIVERT | 4 | 9 | 8 |
TINY OS | 19 | 27 | 17 |
TRANS | 7 | 8 | 6 |
OPENPANA | 8 | 9 | 9 |
SECURE CRT | 7 | 8 | 7 |
EXTENDSIM | 6 | 7 | 5 |
CONSELF | 7 | 19 | 6 |
ARENA | 5 | 12 | 9 |
VENSIM | 8 | 10 | 7 |
MARIONNET | 5 | 7 | 9 |
NETKIT | 6 | 8 | 7 |
GEOIP | 9 | 17 | 8 |
REAL | 7 | 5 | 5 |
NEST | 5 | 10 | 9 |
PTOLEMY | 7 | 8 | 4 |