Vertical Handover Heterogeneous Network Projects envisions in view of the user moving from one point of attachment (PoA) to another in HetNets. To be sure, the vertical Handover that is VHO in Heterogeneous Networks (HetNets) performs over different types of networks such as WiMax, UMTS, WiFi, and others.
Due to the feature of moving in user devices, it is able to connect anywhere and anytime. But the limit of coverage needs to change network with respect to the device, and so the idea of VHO is here. In general, the HetNet take in access for a variety of protocol and IEEE 802 standards.
Unlike Horizontal, VHO allows handoff between inter-systems. Let us say that a HetNets consists of two networks, such as WLAN and WiFi. At this time, a device in link with WLAN may move away from it, and hence it requests for the new link with WiFi network simulation projects. Later, the past link with WLAN breaks, and then a new link with WiFi launches.
When more than one networks are there, then the current access point must make a decision on Handover. In light of this, the Vertical Handover Heterogeneous Network Projects operates on the basis of certain parameters. That is to say, the metrics depend on wireless constraints that exist on the network. From our study, we list the handover metrics here below.
Above all, any one or more metrics will compute and then compare with the threshold value. After that, it gives the decision for Handover. Still, the static threshold value may not bring good decisions since the network is dynamic, which changes in the values. Hence, it is, of course, able to use adaptive threshold values too.
In detail, the regain of the link to the new network needs to be proper without any delay; So that it will not subject to high packet loss, low data rate, and so on. In order to improve the performance of HetNets, it is essential to use a good method for Handover. It is not that the metric gives good results; also, the methods need to be better. With this purpose in mind, we give the methods.
As a result, it attains a high quality of service as well as the quality of experience. On the other hand, it also needs to ensure security on Handover. Since the increase in threats leads to a high risk of security that all of sudden causes poor use of resources. So that the originality of the user must be true, and then the decision process can handle.
In truth, we have our footprint over all the areas. And hence we could guide you on any topic as your wish. To that end, we say that until now, we have 100 plus topics in this field. Join our chain to sparkle your career.
Technology | Ph.D | MS | M.Tech |
---|---|---|---|
NS2 | 75 | 117 | 95 |
NS3 | 98 | 119 | 206 |
OMNET++ | 103 | 95 | 87 |
OPNET | 36 | 64 | 89 |
QULANET | 30 | 76 | 60 |
MININET | 71 | 62 | 74 |
MATLAB | 96 | 185 | 180 |
LTESIM | 38 | 32 | 16 |
COOJA SIMULATOR | 35 | 67 | 28 |
CONTIKI OS | 42 | 36 | 29 |
GNS3 | 35 | 89 | 14 |
NETSIM | 35 | 11 | 21 |
EVE-NG | 4 | 8 | 9 |
TRANS | 9 | 5 | 4 |
PEERSIM | 8 | 8 | 12 |
GLOMOSIM | 6 | 10 | 6 |
RTOOL | 13 | 15 | 8 |
KATHARA SHADOW | 9 | 8 | 9 |
VNX and VNUML | 8 | 7 | 8 |
WISTAR | 9 | 9 | 8 |
CNET | 6 | 8 | 4 |
ESCAPE | 8 | 7 | 9 |
NETMIRAGE | 7 | 11 | 7 |
BOSON NETSIM | 6 | 8 | 9 |
VIRL | 9 | 9 | 8 |
CISCO PACKET TRACER | 7 | 7 | 10 |
SWAN | 9 | 19 | 5 |
JAVASIM | 40 | 68 | 69 |
SSFNET | 7 | 9 | 8 |
TOSSIM | 5 | 7 | 4 |
PSIM | 7 | 8 | 6 |
PETRI NET | 4 | 6 | 4 |
ONESIM | 5 | 10 | 5 |
OPTISYSTEM | 32 | 64 | 24 |
DIVERT | 4 | 9 | 8 |
TINY OS | 19 | 27 | 17 |
TRANS | 7 | 8 | 6 |
OPENPANA | 8 | 9 | 9 |
SECURE CRT | 7 | 8 | 7 |
EXTENDSIM | 6 | 7 | 5 |
CONSELF | 7 | 19 | 6 |
ARENA | 5 | 12 | 9 |
VENSIM | 8 | 10 | 7 |
MARIONNET | 5 | 7 | 9 |
NETKIT | 6 | 8 | 7 |
GEOIP | 9 | 17 | 8 |
REAL | 7 | 5 | 5 |
NEST | 5 | 10 | 9 |
PTOLEMY | 7 | 8 | 4 |